Walter Investment Management Corp. Must Pay More than $29 Million

 

The Justice Department announced today that Walter Investment Management Corp. WIMC has agreed to pay $29.63 million to resolve allegations that WIMC, through its subsidiaries, Reverse Mortgage Solution Inc., REO Management Solutions LLC and RMS Asset Management Solutions LLC, violated the False Claims Act in connection with their participation in the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Home Equity Conversion Mortgages program, which insures “reverse” mortgage loans.  WIMC, through subsidiaries such as RMS and Green Tree Servicing LLC, provides business support to the residential mortgage industry, including servicing of reverse or forward mortgages on behalf of major financial institutions.*

“The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that those who service HUD-insured reverse mortgages are held accountable for their knowing failure to comply with important HUD requirements,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.  “Schemes such as these undermine an important tool available to older Americans who wish to use a HUD-insured reverse mortgage loan to age in place.”

Reverse mortgage loans allow elderly people to access the equity in their homes.  To encourage reverse mortgage loans, HUD insures such loans through a program administered by HUD’s Federal Housing Administration.  Under HUD’s program, a loan becomes due and payable when the home is sold or vacant for more than 12 months or upon the death of the homeowner, whichever comes first.  The lender is repaid the amount of the loan, including the costs of servicing the loan and interest that accrues, after a loan becomes due and payable.  HUD will reimburse a lender that is unable to recoup the full amount of the loan.  In order to file a claim, the servicer is required to meet a number of requirements and deadlines.  Failure to meet these requirements and deadlines could result in denial of the insurance claim.

The government alleged that, from August 2009 to March 2015, RMS, with the knowledge and support of its corporate parent, WIMC, submitted false claims for debenture interest from HUD by failing to properly disclose that it had not met certain deadlines and, therefore, was not entitled to such interest payments.  In order to obtain such interest, HUD requires lenders and their servicers to obtain appraisals within 30 days of the loan becoming due and payable.  The significance of the 30-day appraisal requirement is, among other things, to establish a mutual understanding between the lender and HUD as to the market value of the property so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with foreclosure, engage in a workout with the lender or deal with estate rights issues.

The government also alleged that from July 2010 to October 2014, WIMC, through its subsidiaries, submitted false claims to HUD for the reimbursement of unlawful referral fees by falsely representing them to be lawful sales commissions.  As part of an insurance claim, HUD will reimburse lenders or their servicers for sales commissions paid to real estate agents as part of the liquidation of foreclosed properties.  HUD will not, however, reimburse lenders or their servicers for fees paid for the referral of liquidation business.  According to the government, RMS often used straw companies to liquidate foreclosed properties.  Upon sale of the foreclosed property, the straw companies split the six-percent sales commissions: the real estate agents shared a five-percent sales commission and the companies kept a one-percent referral fee.  These straw companies, in turn, deducted a small fee from the one-percent referral fee and kicked the remainder back to RMS.  Nonetheless, RMS submitted insurance claims to HUD that included payment for the full six-percent sales commission, when, in fact, the payment included a prohibited referral fee.

The settlement resolves allegations filed in a lawsuit by Matthew McDonald, a former executive of RMS, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The act permits private individuals to sue on behalf of the government for false claims and to share in any recovery.  The False Claims Act also permits the government to intervene in such lawsuits, as it did in this case.  Mr. McDonald will receive $5.15 million as his share of the recovery in this case.

This information verified by the Dept. of Justice

EDF Resource Capital Inc. Violates False Claims Act

 

EDF Resource Capital Inc. and its CEO, Frank Dinsmore, have agreed to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act and otherwise failed to remit payments owed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the 504 loan program, the Department of Justice announced today.  Under the settlement agreement, EDF and Dinsmore have agreed to make payments and turn over certain assets to the United States for a total settlement of approximately $6 million.

The SBA 504 loan program provides growing businesses with long-term, fixed-rate financing for major fixed assets, such as land and buildings.  Under the program, local lenders like EDF are responsible for arranging, servicing and collecting on these small business loans, which are guaranteed, in part, by the SBA.  In return for the authority to make determinations on 504 loans without prior SBA approval, EDF was required to bear a share of any losses suffered by the SBA on such loans and to maintain a loan loss reserve fund (LLRF) to help ensure payment of its loss-sharing obligations. 

This settlement resolves claims that EDF and Dinsmore violated the False Claims Act in connection with EDF’s failure to maintain adequate reserves in its LLRF.  EDF allegedly was required to fund its LLRF at a level determined by the riskiness of its 504 loan program portfolio yet knowingly concealed from the SBA hundreds of troubled loans to avoid its obligation to fully fund its LLRF.

The settlement also resolves a lawsuit filed by the United States against EDF and a related entity, Redemption Reliance LLC, alleging that EDF failed to remit required payments to the SBA to satisfy its loss-sharing obligations.  The lawsuit also alleges that the SBA agreed to advance funds to EDF in connection with certain defaulted 504 loans but that, after EDF assigned the loan documents for these loans to Redemption Reliance, neither EDF nor Redemption Reliance remitted the monies owed on these loans to the SBA. 

“The 504 Loan Program provides small businesses with access to the capital they need to start, grow and succeed,” said General Counsel Melvin F. Williams Jr. of the SBA.  “SBA has no tolerance for fraud, waste, or abuse by participants in the 504 Loan Program.  Working with the attorneys at the Department of Justice and SBA’s Office of Inspector General, this settlement marks the successful conclusion of a major enforcement action.”        

“The defendants’ misrepresentations to SBA knowingly put the taxpayer’s money at risk,” said Inspector General Peggy E. Gustafson of the SBA.  “As stewards of the taxpayers’ money, the SBA must guard against losses within its loan portfolios.  In this instance, the actions of the defendants did not allow SBA to protect taxpayers from such losses.  I want to thank the Department of Justice and our investigative partners for achieving this settlement.”

This information confirmed via the US Dept. of Justice.

Payday Loan Lending Scheme Uncovered

The operators of a payday lending scheme that allegedly conned millions of dollars from consumers nationwide have agreed to more than $54 million in settlements with the Federal Trade Commission . The settlements, announced on July 7, arise from allegations by the that Timothy Coppinger, Frampton Rowland III and their companies targeted online payday loan applicants – consumers seeking short-term loans to tide them over until they received their next paycheck. Approximately 400,000 consumers were affected by the scheme, and the settlement funds will be used to reimburse them for losses, according to the FTC.

Using information gathered from data brokers and lead generators, the companies allegedly deposited funds in the applicants’ bank accounts without obtaining permission. The companies subsequently withdrew money to pay recurring “finance” charges without using any of the funds to pay the total allegedly owed, the FTC alleged. The companies also allegedly misrepresented the loans’ costs, finance charges, annual percentage rates payment schedule and other data. Consumers who closed their bank accounts in an effort to stop the unauthorized debits discovered that the companies had sold the purported loans to debt-collection companies that harassed them for payment, the FTC alleged. A federal court in Missouri stopped the operation and froze the Defendants’ assets pending resolution of the FTC allegations.

The Coppinger and Frampton limited liability companies involved in the lawsuit include: CWB Services; Orion Services; Sandpoint Capital; Basseterre Capital; Namakan Capital; Anasazi Services; Anasazi Group; Vandelier Group; St. Armands Group; Longboat Group and Oread Group. The settlements, which require federal court approval, erase any consumer debt purportedly owed to the Defendants and bar them from reporting the debts to credit-reporting agencies.

The agreements, according to the FTC, also ban the Defendants “from any aspect of the consumer lending business, including collecting payments, communicating about loans and selling debt.” If approved by the court, the FTC said the settlements will impose a more than $32.1 million consumer redress judgement on the Coppinger companies agreed and a similar judgement of nearly $21.9 million on the Frampton companies. The judgments against Coppinger and Frampton will be suspended upon their surrender of certain assets, according to the FTC.

Wilbur Huff Sentenced to 12 Years and More Than $108 Million

Wilbur Anthony Huff, 53, of Caneyville and Louisville, Kentucky, was also ordered to pay more than $108 million in restitution for committing various tax crimes that caused more than $50 million in losses to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and a massive fraud that involved the bribery of bank officials, the fraudulent purchase of an insurance company, and the defrauding of insurance regulators and an investment bank.  In December 2014, Huff pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Noemi Reice Buchwald of the Southern District of New York, who imposed today’s sentence.

“Anthony Huff and his co-conspirators stole millions of dollars from taxpayers and engaged in extensive frauds, all in the pursuit of additional property, luxury cars and the like,” said U.S. Attorney Bharara.  “His crimes have earned him 12 years in prison.  I would like to thank our law enforcement partners for their assistance on this case.”

According to the information, plea agreement, sentencing submissions and statements made during court proceedings:
Huff was a businessman who controlled numerous entities located throughout the United States (Huff-Controlled Entities).  Huff controlled the companies and their finances, using them to orchestrate a $53 million fraud on the IRS and other schemes that spanned four states, involving tax violations, bank bribery, fraud on bank regulators and the fraudulent purchase of an insurance company.  As part of his crimes, Huff concealed his control of the Huff-Controlled Entities by installing other individuals to oversee the companies’ day-to-day functions and to serve as the companies’ titular owners, directors, or officers.  Huff also maintained a corrupt relationship with Park Avenue Bank and Charles J. Antonucci Sr., the bank’s president and chief executive officer, and Matthew L. Morris, the bank’s senior vice president. 

Huff further conspired with Morris, Antonucci and others to defraud Oklahoma insurance regulators and others by making misrepresentations and omissions regarding the source of $37.5 million used to purchase Providence Property and Casualty Insurance Company, an insurance company based in Oklahoma that provided workers’ compensation insurance for O2HR’s clients and to whom O2HR owed a significant debt.

 

How Safe Are Your Prescriptions?

Three California men and a Minnesota company were charged in an indictment today in the Southern District of Ohio for their roles in a massive prescription drug diversion scheme. 

The indictment alleges that David Jess Miller, 50, of Santa Ana, California; Artur Stepanyan, 38, and Mihran Stepanyan, 29, both of Encino, California, and Minnesota Independent Cooperative Inc. (MIC) engaged in a conspiracy to sell prescription drugs from illegal, unlicensed sources to wholesalers and pharmacies throughout the United States.  The 12-count indictment charges the defendants with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, multiple counts of mail fraud, and conspiracy to distribute prescription drugs without a license and to make false statements.   
 
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, U.S. Attorney Carter M. Stewart of the Southern District of Ohio, Director George M. Karavetsos of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Office of Criminal Investigations and Assistant Inspector in Charge Christopher White of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) announced the charges. 

According to the indictment, from 2007 through April 2014, David Miller and his company, MIC, of Eagan, Minnesota, purchased prescription drugs from a network of illegal and unlicensed sources in New York, Florida and California.  Artur Stepanyan and Mihran Stepanyan, worked together to sell drugs from illegal sources to Miller and MIC.  Artur and Mihran Stepanyan, using a variety of company names, including Panda Capital Group, Red Rock Capital Group, Trans Atlantic Capital Group and GC National Wholesale, were Miller’s largest source of illegal drugs.  During the course of the conspiracy, Miller and MIC paid the Stepanyans approximately $160 million for these prescription drugs. 

“American consumers should be able to rely on the prescription drug supply chain,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Mizer.  “Prescription drug diversion schemes like the one charged in this indictment undermine that supply chain and increase the risk that counterfeit, adulterated, misbranded, sub-potent or expired drugs will be sold to patients and consumers.” 

To hide the true, illegal sources of their prescription drugs, David Miller and MIC falsified so-called drug pedigree documents.  Pedigrees are documents required by law that show the source of drugs.  For most of the conspiracy, the fraudulent pedigrees falsely listed B&Y Wholesale, a company located in Puerto Rico and co-owned by co-conspirator Yusef Yassin Gomez (Yassin) as the source of the drugs.  The pedigree documents also falsely stated that Yassin’s company was an authorized distributor of the drugs.  On Feb. 19, 2014, Yassin pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to conspiracy to engage in the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs without a wholesale license.  In connection with his guilty plea, Yassin admitted the he agreed to allow Miller and MIC to use his company’s name on pedigree documents to hide the true drug sources.  In exchange, Miller and MIC paid Yassin a commission on all of the drug sales. 

 “Once a prescription drug is diverted outside of the regulated distribution channels, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, for regulators, law enforcement and end-users to know whether the prescription drug package actually contains the correct drug or the correct dose,” said U.S. Attorney Stewart.  “We will aggressively prosecute individuals and companies that ignore the law and sell illegally diverted prescription drugs to pharmacies, and ultimately, to American consumers.
“We are committed to protecting the integrity of the pharmaceutical supply chain, especially as criminals go to more extreme measures to subvert it,” said FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations Director Karavetsos. “We will continue to pursue these criminals and work to bring them to justice.”
“The Postal Inspection Service is proud to partner with the FDA Office of Criminal Investigations to bring to bear our mail fraud expertise to help the fight against drug diversion,” said USPIS Assistant Inspector in Charge White.

Throughout the course of the conspiracy charged in the indictment, using these fraudulent pedigree documents, Miller and MIC sold approximately $393 million worth of prescription drugs to wholesalers and retail pharmacies throughout the United States, including to multiple customers in the Southern District of Ohio. 

In addition to Yassin, two of Miller’s other illegal drug suppliers, Peter Kats and Joseph Dallal, previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud for their sales of illegally-diverted prescription drugs to Miller and MIC. 

This matter is being investigated by the FDA and USPIS.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Anne L. Porter and Christy Muncy of the Southern District of Ohio and Trial Attorney John W. Burke of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch are prosecuting this case.

David Miller, Artur Stepanyan, and Mihran Stepanyan were charged amongst 30 other individuals in the Northern District of California in a separate indictment on charges including federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act; conspiracy to commit identity theft; conspiracy to commit access device fraud; conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and bank fraud; money laundering conspiracy; and conspiracy to distribute prescription drugs without a wholesale license.

This information is according to the Department Of Justice website.

The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and do not constitute proof of guilt.  Every defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Is This The American Way? Fraud-Fraud-and More Fraud!

 

What does Fraud look like? Inside gated communities where guards demand photo ID even from Santa, CEOs’ Christmas plums are super-sugared with record-breaking corporate profits.

These are people somehow not derided as moochers, even though their million-dollar pay packages are propped up by tax breaks.
The parable of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol springs to mind as Wall Street banks and law firms hand out six- and seven-figure year-end bonuses while Wal-Mart and fast food workers protest wages so low that their holiday meals are food pantry dregs. It is CEOs, not the working poor, who deserve public scorn for their dependence on government handouts.

The Institute for Policy Studies issued a report last month that details the mooching of the nation’s top corporations and CEOs. It’s called “Fleecing Uncle Sam.” The findings are pretty galling.
Of America’s 100 top-paid CEOs, 29 worked schemes that enabled them to collect more in compensation than their corporations paid in income taxes. The average pay for these 29: $32 million. For one year. And corporations mangle tax the code to deduct that too.
Though their corporations reported combined pre-tax profits of $24 billion, they wrangled $238 million in tax refunds out of the federal government. That’s refunds — the government gave money to highly profitable corporations.

That’s an effective tax rate of negative one percent.
That means middle-class taxpayers helped cover the cost of million-dollar pay packages for CEOs. Middle class taxpayers, whose median family income is $51,324 and whose federal income taxes are withdrawn directly from their checks before they see a cent of pay, support CEOs who pull down $32 million a year.

Their corporations pay nothing for essential government services that middle class taxpayers provide. That includes patent protection, the Commerce Department’s sanctions against foreign trade rule violations and federal court dispute resolution.
Some corporations haven’t developed schemes enabling them to tax the federal government. Instead, they pay, but not at that 35 percent rate they’re always whining about. Between 2008 and 2012, the average large corporation, according to Fleecing Uncle Sam, paid just 19.4 percent. Individuals earning $50,000 a year pay 25 percent. Clearly, corporations are not paying a fair share at 19 percent.

There’s this wacky theory that if governments excuse corporations from paying their share, then they’ll expand and create jobs. It’s wacky because it’s fiction. Highly profitable corporations aren’t expanding and creating jobs; they’re buying back their own stock.

A study by University of Massachusetts professor William Lazonick, president of the Academic-Industry Research Network, showed that between 2003 and 2012, S&P 500 corporations used 54 percent of their earnings – $2.4 trillion – to buy their own stock.

And this is the AMERICAN Way??

Over Charging Overdraft Fees -- Thanks Comerica Bank

 

New York- Final approval has been granted in the $14.5 million settlement of consumer fraud class action involving overdraft fees charged by Comerica Bank NA. The class action involved people who had been charged overdraft fees on their Comerica Bank accounts between 2004 and 2010. The Comerica overdraft class action lawsuit alleged the bank posted debit card transactions in dollar amounts ordered from highest to lowest so as to maximize the number of overdraft fees it could levy against its customers.
According to the lawsuit, rather than declining transactions that would put a customer into overdraft, Comerica authorized the transactions, subsequently processing them in an order that would increase the banks’ overdraft revenue.

Eligible class members include anyone who held a Comerica bank account in Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan or Texas and incurred one or more overdraft fees as a result of Comerica’s non-consecutive posting of transactions between 2004 and 2010. Specific class periods vary by state.

The Class Periods by state are:

• For Settlement Class Members who opened accounts in Arizona, the period from February 18, 2004 through August 15, 2010.

• For Settlement Class Members who opened accounts in California, the period from February 18, 2006 through August 15, 2010.

• For Settlement Class Members who opened accounts in Florida, the period from February 18, 2005 through August 15, 2010.

• For Settlement Class Members who opened accounts in Michigan, the period from February 18, 2004 through August 15, 2010.

• For Settlement Class Members who opened accounts in Texas, the period from February 18, 2006 through August 15, 2010.

Eligible class members must have had two or more Overdraft Fees caused by debits posted to their accounts on a single day during the time period listed above. For further information on the Comerica class action lawsuit settlement, and to download forms, visit: http://comericabankoverdraftsettlement.com